riflettendo su quest' articolo.
Primo: ripenso a Gramsci
La crisi consiste appunto nel fatto che il vecchio muore e il nuovo non può nascere: in questo interregno si verificano i fenomeni morbosi più svariati.
nel mio caso direi:
La crisi consiste appunto nel fatto che il vecchio non muore (antropologia) e il nuovo si afferma contaminato dal vecchio.
In fin dei conti cosa c'entri google con l'elusione fiscale mondiale sistematica non riesco proprio a capirlo: perchè non pagare tutte le tasse possibili, con i soldi ci fanno acquisizioni, per la maggior parte sbagliate. Il cuore del loro proggetto è la tecnologia e l'effetto network cvhe hanno raggiunto con essa.
Invece l'analisi della meritocrazia viene da una facoltà di legge: cosa ci dice, che le università sono veramente così importanti.
- per la ricerca tecnologica e scientifica, praticamente non c'è altro posto, per quello che leggevo anche gli scienziati di google vogliono poter pubblicare;
- i diritti mi sembra si siano sviluppati tutti nella società economica e non nelle università
- la politica ugualmente
- la globalizzazione
- internet è nata dai militari o dall'università?
quindi perchè tanta enfasi sulla meritocrazia universitaria? concentrata in facoltà marginali come legge e management.
Perchè una società che non si sviluppa e si rinchiude in se stessa sarà preda delle elites conservatrici?
Certo ora la complessità dell'innovazione e della crescita porta a una certa sclerosi del processo economico, e ancora di più di quello imprenditoriale dovuto anche a un eccesso di risparmio
reflecting on this article.First: I am rethinking Gramsci: The crisis consists in the fact that the old dies and the new cannot be born: in this interregnum the most varied morbid phenomena occur.
In my case I would say:
The crisis consists in the fact that the old does not die (anthropology) and the new states itself contaminated by the old.After all, what does google have to do with systematic world tax avoidance? I just can't understand it: why not pay all the possible taxes, with the money they make acquisitions, mostly wrong. The heart of their project is technology and the network effect they have achieved with it.Instead the analysis of meritocracy comes from a faculty of law: what it tells us, that universities are really so important.for technological and scientific research, there is practically no other place, for what I read even google scientists want to be able to publish;all the rights seem to have developed in the economic society and not in the universities;politics equally;the globalization;was the internet born of the military or the university?so why so much emphasis on university meritocracy? concentrated in marginal faculties such as law and management.Why will a society that does not develop and shut itself up as a prey to conservative elites?Of course now the complexity of innovation and growth leads to a certain sclerosis of the economic process, and even more of the entrepreneurial process due also to an excess of savings
In my case I would say:
The crisis consists in the fact that the old does not die (anthropology) and the new states itself contaminated by the old.After all, what does google have to do with systematic world tax avoidance? I just can't understand it: why not pay all the possible taxes, with the money they make acquisitions, mostly wrong. The heart of their project is technology and the network effect they have achieved with it.Instead the analysis of meritocracy comes from a faculty of law: what it tells us, that universities are really so important.for technological and scientific research, there is practically no other place, for what I read even google scientists want to be able to publish;all the rights seem to have developed in the economic society and not in the universities;politics equally;the globalization;was the internet born of the military or the university?so why so much emphasis on university meritocracy? concentrated in marginal faculties such as law and management.Why will a society that does not develop and shut itself up as a prey to conservative elites?Of course now the complexity of innovation and growth leads to a certain sclerosis of the economic process, and even more of the entrepreneurial process due also to an excess of savings
No comments:
Post a Comment